What is the burden of proving reversible error in a motion to challenge a judgment or order of the lower court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Orange Cnty. Dep't of Child Support Servs. v. Gutierrez, G049878 (Cal. App. 2015):
"It is well settled, of course, that a party challenging a judgment has the burden of showing reversible error by an adequate record. [Citations.]" (Ballard v. Uribe (1986) 41 Cal.3d 564, 574-575.) "'"A judgment or order of the lower court is presumed correct. All intendments and presumptions are indulged to support it on matters as to which the record is silent, and error must be affirmatively shown. This is
Page 4
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving reversible error in a motion to appeal against a finding of error at the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What burden is on an appellant to prove that the trial court committed an error that justifies reversal of the judgment? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a judgment or order of the lower court is presumed correct on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving reversible error in a motion to set aside defaults? (California, United States of America)
When a judgment of divorce is not self-executing in respect of any division of property ordered, does the court have jurisdiction to make further orders to compel obedience to the order? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal dealt with a motion to reverse a judgment in the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the language of the majority opinion in a motion that reverses the trial court's judgment that proxies cannot be used in the election of directors? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
