What is the burden of proving ineffective assistance to the effectiveness of the trial counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Killebrew, F066871 (Cal. App. 2014):

3. Appellant's challenges can be construed to be a challenge to the effectiveness of his trial counsel. The defendant has the burden of proving ineffective assistance of trial counsel. To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the defendant must establish not only deficient performance, which is performance below an objective standard of reasonableness, but also prejudice. A court must indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance. Tactical errors are generally not deemed reversible. Counsel's decisionmaking is evaluated in the context of the available facts. To the extent the record fails to disclose why counsel acted or failed to act in the manner challenged, appellate courts will affirm the judgment unless counsel was asked for an explanation and failed to provide one, or, unless there simply could be no satisfactory explanation. Prejudice must be affirmatively proved. The record must affirmatively demonstrate a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. (People v. Maury (2003) 30 Cal.4th 342, 389.) Attorneys are not expected to engage in tactics or to file motions that are futile. (Id. at p. 390; also see People v. Mendoza (2000) 24 Cal.4th 130, 166.)

Other Questions


Is ineffective assistance the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving ineffective assistance of trial counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to prove that his trial counsel's stipulation to vacate the court's ruling amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance ineffective assistance based on a trial counsel's failure to object to a restitution order? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving ineffective assistance of trial counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial on ineffective assistance of counsel fail to address the issue of ineffective assistance? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving ineffective assistance of trial counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance to counsel ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.