California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Pyne v. Fletcher Jones Mgmt. Grp., Inc., A129654 (Cal. App. 2013):
A party who petitions to compel other parties to an arbitration agreement to arbitrate a dispute bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence. (Jones v. Jacobson (2011) 195 Cal.App.4th 1, 15.) A nonsignatory who seeks to enforce an arbitration agreement against a signatory has the burden to show that the nonsignatory is a party to the arbitration agreement covering the dispute. (Ibid.)
"There is no uniform standard of reviewing for evaluating an order denying a motion to compel arbitration. [Citation.] If the court's order is based on a decision of fact, then we adopt a substantial evidence standard. [Citations.] Alternatively, if the court's denial rests solely on a decision of law, then a de novo standard of review is employed. [Citations.]" (Robertson v. Health Net of California, Inc. (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 1419, 1425.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.