What is the burden of ineffective assistance of counsel?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Daniels, F064237 (Cal. App. 2014):
To prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, appellant bears the burden of establishing deficient performance under an objective standard of professional reasonableness and prejudice under a test of reasonable probability of a more favorable outcome. (People v. Hernandez (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1040, 1052-1053.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is ineffective assistance the burden of proving ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance to counsel ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does ineffective assistance of counsel constitute ineffective representation of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel ineffective assistance on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's characterization of the burden of proof? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance ineffective assistance based on a trial counsel's failure to object to a restitution order? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial on ineffective assistance of counsel fail to address the issue of ineffective assistance? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance of counsel ineffective when counsel fails to object to the issue? (California, United States of America)
What is the administrative burden that would result if a motion-to-strike procedure was extended to include a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
