California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Murillo v. Superior Court, 143 Cal.App.4th 730, 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 511 (Cal. App. 2006):
The alternative is to ban requests for admissions. We acknowledge the "strong government interest in protecting the public from those who are dangerous and mentally ill." (People v. Otto, supra, 26 Cal.4th at p. 214, 109 Cal.Rptr.2d 327, 26 P.3d 1061.) Admittedly, requests for admissions could serve to narrow the issues required to be proven, thus fulfilling that interest. But because requests could completely eliminate the need for any proof, the benefit to the district attorney is outweighed by the detriment to a potential committee. Insisting that the district attorney prove all of the elements at trial, rather than allowing requests for admissions, is not so onerous that it should checkmate a person's due process rights.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.