What is the abuse of discretion standard of review of a decision by the California Court of Appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Alvarez, B257504 (Cal. App. 2015):
Even if the issue were properly before us, we would not find any abuse of discretion. (People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 745-746 ["An appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to any decision by a trial court to
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an appeal of the Court of Appeal's decision not to grant relief on appeal from an alleged abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, when will a court's decision not to admit or exclude evidence from Page 17 be reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of the Court of Appeal's decision not to interfere with the Court on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How will the courts review a trial court's decision to exclude evidence for abuse of abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by the California Superior Court to review a public agency's decision for compliance with the CEQA? (California, United States of America)
How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)
Is a superior court's ruling on a motion for discretionary relief under section 473, subdivision (b) of the California Civil Code reviewed on appeal for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing an appeal of a sentence for abuse of abuse of power, how will the appellate court review the sentence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a decision by the Superior Court of Appeal to deny probation to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence, can the judge rely on another court's decision not to grant probation? (California, United States of America)
Is the California Court of Appeal's review of the California Fire and Rescue Service's policy review procedure properly circumscribed? (California, United States of America)
