What is relevant evidence in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miles, 263 Cal.Rptr.3d 144, 464 P.3d 611, 9 Cal.5th 513 (Cal. 2020):

Only relevant evidence is admissible. ( Evid. Code, 350.) Relevant evidence is defined as "evidence, including evidence relevant to the credibility of a witness or hearsay declarant, having any tendency in reason to prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action." ( Evid. Code, 210.) "The court in its discretion may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the probability that its admission will (a) necessitate undue consumption of time or (b) create substantial danger of undue prejudice, of confusing the issues, or of misleading the jury." ( Evid. Code, 352.) " Prejudice, as used in Evidence Code section 352, is not synonymous with damaging. [Citation.] Rather, it refers to evidence that uniquely tends to evoke an emotional bias against the defendant as an individual, and has little to do with the legal issues raised in the trial." ( People v. McCurdy (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1063, 1095, 176 Cal.Rptr.3d 103, 331 P.3d 265.)

Other Questions


What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for using evidence of an uncharged sexual offence as evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence of prior sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard of review in a sexual assault case when the prosecution case is based on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test of relevance for admitting or excluding relevant evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When testifying in a sexual assault case, does the use of the word "sex" by the victims constitute sufficient evidence for the purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.