What is reasonable or due diligence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dowell, G052630 (Cal. App. 2017):
Reasonable or due diligence means "'"persevering application, untiring efforts in good earnest, efforts of a substantial character."'" (People v. Cogswell (2010) 48 Cal.4th 467, 477.) Considerations "include the timeliness of the search, the
Page 14
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the defense meet the reasonable diligence and reasonable diligence requirements of a jury in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes reasonable diligence or "due diligence" under California Evidence Code section 240? (California, United States of America)
What is the test to measure reasonable diligence? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of an instruction defining reasonable doubt result in a jury failing to apply the same reasonable doubt test? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
