The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Boniface, 110 F.3d 70 (9th Cir. 1997):
Bolain's second and final contention is that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain his conviction. We have reviewed the record, find the evidence compelling to say the least, and hold that a "rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Vgeri, 51 F.3d 876, 879 (9th Cir.1995). Thus, this contention must also fail.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.