What is a trial court's responsibility to ensure that a defendant's right to counsel is fully protected?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Holland, 151 Cal.Rptr. 625, 23 Cal.3d 77, 588 P.2d 765 (Cal. 1978):

The trial court's responsibility to assure that a defendant's right to counsel is fully protected was also evident in People v. Crovedi, supra, 65 Cal.2d 199, 53 Cal.Rptr. 284, 417 P.2d 868. In that case, the trial court refused to grant a proposed seven-week continuance in the trial to permit the return of defendant's counsel, who had become ill during the trial. That attorney's law partner was appointed to represent the defendant and ordered to continue the trial, over the objections of the defendant and appointed counsel. Thus, the defendant was denied the assistance of his chosen counsel while being forced to proceed with another attorney.

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to agree to a response to a jury question on appeal because defense counsel suggested and consented to the responses given by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when a trial court denies his motion to substitute one appointed counsel for another? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court erred by failing to give a defendant separate advisement of his right to counsel and obtaining a waiver of that right? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a motion for a new trial alleging inadequacy of counsel, does the court have to appoint a new counsel? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
How has the trial court treated the waiver of a defendant's right to stand trial by jury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.