What is a trial court's duty to instruct sua sponte on certain self-defense defenses?

California, United States of America

The following excerpt is from The People v. Reyes, E047521, No. RIF1234419 (Cal. App. 2010):

A trial court's duty to instruct sua sponte on particular defenses arises "'only if it appears that the defendant is relying on such a defense, or if there is substantial evidence supportive of such a defense and the defense is not inconsistent with the defendant's theory of the case.' [Citation.]" (People v. Breverman (1998) 19 Cal.4th 142, 157.) Here, there was not substantial evidence supporting a finding of perfect self-defense, as defined in CALCRIM No. 505. The trial court thus was not required to give CALCRIM No. 505.

Other Questions

Does a trial court have a duty to instruct a sua sponte on a defense if they are relying on the defense? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court required to instruct sua sponte on any defense including self-defense? (California, United States of America)
If there was substantial evidence of imperfect self-defense not inconsistent with the defense theory of the case, does the trial court have a sua sponte duty to instruct a defendant not to testify? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the principles defining a trial court's duty to instruct sua sponte on defense? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
What is the sua sponte duty of a trial court to instruct a defendant on a defense of kidnapping during the commission of a murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the de novo standard of review applied to an appeal that contends the trial court should have instructed sua sponte on a lesser included offense or defense? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have to instruct on unreasonable self-defense or defense of others? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.






Alexi purple


Company

  • About
  • Contact us
  • Press
  • Matters
  • Legal

    • Product

  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • Solo & small firms
  • Midsize firms
  • Large firms
  • In-house counsel

    • Resources

  • Resource hub
  • Sample memos
  • Blog
  • FAQ


    • © Copyright 2023 Alexi Inc. All rights reserved.