What is a reasonable restriction on the possession of cats?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn., 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 299, 15 Cal.App.4th 315 (Cal. App. 1992):
Mere possession of cats does not create a nuisance per se. (People v. Cooper (1944) 64 Cal.App.2d Supp. 946, 949, 149 P.2d 86.) But it is not necessary, for a restriction to be reasonable, for it to prohibit only use rising to the level of a nuisance; a reasonable restriction can prohibit use falling far short of a nuisance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the "necessity" test for determining whether a restriction or restriction on a prisoner's constitutional rights is restrictive enough to be struck down? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances would the Court have found that possession for sale and possession for possession of a firearm be a less favourable verdict than the previous verdict? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is a restriction on social media a reasonable restriction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a court change the charge of simple possession of marijuana to the charged offense of possession of possession for sale? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant can reasonably have reasonably anticipated the events leading up to the action? (California, United States of America)
Is reasonable cause reasonable cause sufficient to warrantless arrest? (California, United States of America)
Is defendant's possession of a loaded firearm sufficient to permit a jury to view his possession as an implied threat of violence? (California, United States of America)
