What is a defendant's duty of counsel in a criminal case to instruct a jury on the principles of law relevant to their understanding of the case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Butler, G043100 (Cal. App. 2012):

given . . . even though no objection was made thereto in the lower court, if the substantial rights of the defendant were affected thereby." (Pen. Code, 1259.) "'In criminal cases, even in the absence of a request, a trial court must instruct on general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the evidence and necessary for the jury's understanding of the case.'" (People v. Anderson (2011) 51 Cal.4th 989, 996.) The court's duty extends to defenses supported by substantial evidence (id. at p. 996), a principle which is pertinent here because the Attorney General contends defendant's alleged lack of knowledge that the notes were securities is at most an affirmative defense, not an element of the crime.

Other Questions


Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a criminal offence against a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, in what circumstances will the trial court grant a request to instruct on the general principles of law relevant to the issue? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Is there an undue "chilling effect" on the procedural rights of criminal defendants when the jury instructs a criminal defendant to testify before the jury that he will be cross-examined? (California, United States of America)
Are statements about the role of prosecutors and defense counsel in determining the guilt of a defendant in a criminal case relevant? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to complain to the Court on appeal that an instruction in a criminal case instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possessing all six firearms was "too general or incomplete"? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a properly instructed jury would have acquitted defendant of criminal threat but convicted her of making criminal threat? (California, United States of America)
Is a court required to instruct a plaintiff on the principles of law relevant to their criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is a parent, relative, or co-habitant of a defendant in a criminal case outside the scope of marital privilege in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.