What factors will the court consider in allowing the prosecution to reopen after jury deliberations had begun?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hernandez, B235560 (Cal. App. 2012):
We review the factors set forth in People v. Newton, supra, 8 Cal.App.3d at page 383, to consider the court's exercise of discretion in permitting the prosecution to reopen after jury deliberations had begun.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where the Court considered the "great violence factor" as a factor in determining the appropriate sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a jury was ordered to reconstitute its deliberations after the trial court ordered that the jury had already retired from deliberations to consider the relevant material? (California, United States of America)
On remand, what factors will the court consider in determining the reasonableness of the prosecution delay? (California, United States of America)
How have the jury been instructed to interpret the meaning of deliberate deliberate deliberate use of the word "deliberately" in the dictionary? (California, United States of America)
What factors will the court consider in denying a motion to suppress an involuntary confession? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's reading of a transcript from the Superior Court of Justice's hearing into a murder conviction for a prior conviction for the same crime be considered admissible under section 190.3, factor (b) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can the jury consider the importance of the age factor in determining whether or not the evidence should be considered "triple count" or "double count"? (California, United States of America)
Does the court error to instruct the jury to consider age as an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court allow the prosecution to exclude evidence of bias in a witness statement? (California, United States of America)
