What factors were considered to support a reasonable belief that the officer's safety was at risk?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fisher, A153971 (Cal. App. 2019):
he was doing; the situation was "getting kind of heated." This combination of circumstances supported a reasonable belief that the officer's safety was at risk. (People v. Avila (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1069, 1074.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What factors must a court consider in determining whether a new sentence would result in an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
What is the reasonableness of a police officer's belief that detaining defendant, even briefly, was necessary to protect their safety? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for meeting the burden of showing that there is a reasonable probability of a zoning change and that it was reasonable and proper for an appraiser to consider this factor in determining the value of the subject property? (California, United States of America)
Can a public safety officer's investigation by his commanding officer or other member of the employing public safety department that could lead to punitive action? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons why a jury was unable to consider a defendant's subjective belief that they had reached a place of temporary safety? (California, United States of America)
Is the failure to give a "reasonable doubt" instruction sufficient to be considered as an aggravating factor under section 190.3, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What factors are considered mitigating factors in a conviction for residential burglary? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury consider any factor in aggravation only if it unanimously agrees that such factor exists? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
