California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ismael V., F061355 (Cal. App. 2011):
The evidence was also sufficient to establish the second prong of the required showing, i.e., that appellant acted with the requisite specific intent. In interpreting section 186.22(b)(1), which provides for a sentence enhancement for a person convicted of a felony when requirements identical to those set forth in section 186.22(d) are met,5the court in People v. Albillar (2010) 51 Cal.4th 47 stated, "The enhancement already requires proof that the defendant commit a gang-related crime in the first prongi.e., that
Page 11
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.