What evidence does the court need to establish that the intent of the applicant was not intended?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Quest Diagnostics, Inc. v. Kent, C083565 (Cal. App. 2018):
Because we do not find any ambiguity in the language of the 2012 legislation, we do not have any occasion to resort to extrinsic evidence of intent. (City of Brentwood v. Campbell, supra, 237 Cal.App.4th at pp. 501-502.) Nor do the parties in any event point
Page 6
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
In a Family Law Application to the Court of Appeal, how have the courts dealt with the issue of sufficiency of evidence in support of a jurisdictional finding? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support a motion to dismiss an application for relief from the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have a duty to give an instruction that the prosecution substantially relies on circumstantial evidence to establish any element of the crime including the element of intent? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
