The following excerpt is from United States v. Crum, 934 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2019):
Our decision in Sandoval v. Sessions , 866 F.3d 986 (9th Cir. 2017), on which the majority relies, reflects an incorrect view of what solicitation means. In Sandoval , we equated offering to sell a controlled substance with soliciting delivery of a controlled substance, id. at 99091, but for the reason just stated they are not the same thing. That analytical error was not necessary to the conclusion we ultimately reached. So I do not view that aspect of Sandoval s reasoning as binding here, and I would not perpetuate the error we made there.
Notes:
1 Section 4B1.2(b) reads in full:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.