What constitutes abuse of discretion under the Family Code and/or DVPA?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from R.G. v. Pena, F073699 (Cal. App. 2018):

"A granting or denial of injunctive relief is generally reviewed by the appellate court based upon the abuse of discretion standard. [Citation.] This standard applies to the grant or denial of a protective order under the DVPA. [Citations.] In reviewing the evidence, the reviewing court must apply the 'substantial evidence standard of review,' meaning ' "whether, on the entire record, there is any substantial evidence, contradicted or uncontradicted," supporting the trial court's finding. [Citation.] "We must accept as true all evidence . . . tending to establish the correctness of the trial court's findings . . . , resolving every conflict in favor of the judgment." ' " (Burquet v. Brumbaugh (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1140, 1143.)

Under Family Code section 6203, subdivision (a), " 'abuse' [under the DVPA] means any of the following: [] (1) To intentionally or recklessly to cause or attempt to cause bodily injury. [] (2) Sexual assault. [] (3) To place a person in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious bodily injury to that person or to another. [] (4) To engage in any behavior that has been or could be enjoined pursuant to Section 6320." Under subdivision (b), "[a]buse is not limited to the actual infliction of physical injury or assault." Family Code Section 6320, subdivision (a) further provides: "The court may issue an . . . order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking, striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering, credibly impersonating as described in Section 528.5 of the Penal Code, falsely personating as described in section 529 of the Penal Code, harassing, telephoning, including, but not limited to, making annoying telephone calls as described in Section 653m of the Penal Code, destroying personal property, contacting, either directly or indirectly, by mail or otherwise, coming within a specified distance of, or disturbing the peace of the other party, and, in the discretion of the court, on a showing of good cause, of other named family or household members." (See Burquet v. Brumbaugh, supra, 223 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1143-1144.) Disturbing the

Page 5

peace is broadly interpreted to mean destroying the mental or emotional calm of the other. (Id. at pp. 1146-1147)

Other Questions


Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "abuse of discretion" in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is abuse of discretion an abuse of the discretion test? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that a defendant currently poses an unreasonable risk to public safety constitute an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence of gang membership to prove witness bias constitute abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for pretrial discovery of a psychiatric record constitute an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a superior court's decision not to continue, on its own motion, a hearing for a restraining order under the DVPA reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of evidence of a victim's alleged motive to lie constitute abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.