What constitutes a waiver of the statute of limitations?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Mitchell v. Asbestos Corp., 59 Cal.App.4th 366, 69 Cal.Rptr.2d 164 (Cal. App. 1997):
Waiver. Waiver of the statute of limitations typically occurs through failure to plead, or adequately plead, the defense (Hall v. Chamberlain (1948) 31 Cal.2d 673, 679-
Page 171
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a plaintiff entitled to a waiver of the Statute of Limitations and Waiver of the Limitations? (California, United States of America)
Does section 360.5 of the California Statute of limitations bar a plaintiff from bringing a claim against the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations applicable to this cause of action, the Government Tort Claims Act, preclude a plaintiff from bringing an action against a governmental entity within the applicable statute of limitation? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant waives a waiver of his right to leave the scene of the crime, does the waiver constitute a knowing waiver? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a motion seeking to amend the constitution? (California, United States of America)
Does appellant's failure to object on the grounds of waiver on appeal to the Court of Appeal constitute waiver? (California, United States of America)
Is a waiver of the statute of limitations valid in a "tolling agreement" between the parties? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to a cause of action based on federal law or constitutional principles? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding on standing and the statute of limitations in the Killackey Action constitute an alternative to the earlier judgment? (California, United States of America)
How much discretion, within reason, does the Supreme Court have to exercise in deciding whether to limit the scope of limits on the use of certain constitutional provisions? (California, United States of America)
