What constitutes a reasonable use of a residential property by a neighbour?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Breckenfeld v. Kiaii, E049740 (Cal. App. 2011):
In sum, respondent's testimony at the hearing on October 16, 2009, was detailed and compelling. The conduct he described, which continued to occur over an extended period of time, was significantly greater than the usual "inconveniences and annoyances from the reasonable use of property by neighbors." (Schild v. Rubin, supra, 232
Page 8
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a failure to instruct on defense of property constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does increased vehicular traffic over a street adjacent to property restricted to residential use destroy or abrogate the residential restriction? (California, United States of America)
Does a court's specification of reasons for granting a motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds or reasons for the decision to grant the motion, constitute untimely and void? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for meeting the burden of showing that there is a reasonable probability of a zoning change and that it was reasonable and proper for an appraiser to consider this factor in determining the value of the subject property? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that an unfair labor practice-related reason for termination constitute a preemption of a plaintiff's cause of action based on other illegal reasons? (California, United States of America)
