What constitutes a reasonable time for a plaintiff to be admitted to hospital?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bishop Arbors LLC v. Meadowcreek Mut. Water Co., E056232 (Cal. App. 2014):
being exactly ascertained." "What constitutes such a reasonable time ordinarily presents a question of fact, dependent upon the circumstances of the case. [Citation.]" (Kotler v. PacifiCare of California (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 950, 956.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that an unfair labor practice-related reason for termination constitute a preemption of a plaintiff's cause of action based on other illegal reasons? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who was committed to a state hospital because they had been found not guilty by reason of insanity be released from the hospital? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is committed to a state hospital by reason of reason of insanity after having been found not guilty of a crime, what is the current commitment period? (California, United States of America)
Does a court's specification of reasons for granting a motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds or reasons for the decision to grant the motion, constitute untimely and void? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a Defendant has made a reasonable and reasonable offer under section 998 of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the placement of C.C. 1190 of the Criminal Code constitute a constitutional error requiring reversal unless lack of prejudice is shown beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does an extraction of blood "taken by a physician in a hospital environment according to accepted medical practices" constitute a "reasonable manner" under the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
