What constitutes a lewd or lascivious act?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Wallace, 11 Cal.App.4th 568, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 67 (Cal. App. 1992):

"Virtually any act can fit this description [of a lewd or lascivious act], depending upon the intent with which it is done. As stated in People v. Hobbs (1952) 109 Cal.App.2d 189, 192 [240 P.2d 411]: 'Section 288 of the Penal Code was enacted to protect children from the lustful advances and tamperings of callous and unscrupulous persons as well as from the assaults of [11 Cal.App.4th 578] depraved unfortunates. In all cases arising under this statute the purpose of the perpetrator in touching the child is the controlling factor and each case is to be examined in the light of the intent with which the act was done. In People v. Owen [ (1945) ] 68 Cal.App.2d 617, 620 [157 P.2d 432] [citation], it is said that "It is not the accomplishment but the intent of the party that is the basis of the commission of the acts condemned in Penal Code section 288." If intent of the act, although it may have the outward appearance of innocence, is to arouse, or appeal to, or gratify the lust, the passion or the sexual desire of the perpetrator it stands condemned by the statute, or, if it is intended to arouse feelings of passion or sexual desire in the child, it likewise stands condemned.' " (Pitts, supra, 223 Cal.App.3d at p. 887, 273 Cal.Rptr. 757; emphasis added.)

Other Questions


Does the execution of an innocent person by lethal injection constitute a constitutional intolerable event? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes misconduct under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when it infects the trial with such unfairness as to make the conviction a denial of due process? (California, United States of America)
Does a custodial interrogation during an interview with a police officer constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a constitutional revision and a constitutional amendment? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does the erroneous admission into evidence of an involuntary confession constitute a federal constitutional error? (California, United States of America)
Does the exclusion of evidence in a civil case constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's argument that the absence of specific mitigating factors constitute aggravation constitute prosecutorial misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a constitutional amendment to the California Constitution that prohibits certain types of sexual activity? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.