What comments were made by the trial judge in response to defendant's remarks to the court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lamonte, E062102 (Cal. App. 2017):

None of these comments were unfair or showed a judicial bias against defendant. All of the comments were fairly made in response to defendant's remarks to the court, and were directed at controlling the proceedings and getting defendant to articulate an offer of proof to support his defense. Section 1044 requires the trial judge "'to control all proceedings during the trial, and to limit the introduction of evidence and the argument of counsel to relevant and material matters.'" (See People v. Sturm, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1237.) Moreover, all of these comments were made outside the presence of the jury. Though a trial judge's "behavior outside the jury's presence may provide context for his behavior in the jury's presence," as we next explain, "defendant offers no compelling examples of prejudicial behavior in front of the jury." (People v. Peoples, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 790.)

2. Comments Before the Jury

Other Questions


Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a restriction on comment by the trial court on comments by a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of why defendant's trial counsel failed to object to the sentencing on the ground that the trial court improperly used defendant's religious beliefs as a basis for his sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to agree to a response to a jury question on appeal because defense counsel suggested and consented to the responses given by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When will a court grant a defendant an instruction that cautions the jury that it may not draw an adverse inference from the fact that a defendant has not testified at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.