The following excerpt is from Pollard & Wheeler Props., LLC v. Cearley, No. 2:15-cv-1068 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. 2015):
Even apart from the authority granted by the in forma pauperis statute, this court must remand the action once it becomes apparent that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. 1447 ("[i]f at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded"); California ex rel. Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc., 375 F.3d 831, 838, as amended, 387 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2004) ("[i]f the district court at any time determines that it lacks jurisdiction over the removed action, it must remedy the improvident grant of removal by remanding the action to state court"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 974 (2005).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.