California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tirado, 251 Cal.Rptr.3d 412, 38 Cal.App.5th 637 (Cal. App. 2019):
Our conclusion is consistent with the well-settled principle that "prosecuting authorities, exercising executive functions, ordinarily have the sole discretion to determine ... what charges to bring." ( People v. Birks (1998) 19 Cal.4th 108, 134, 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 848, 960 P.2d 1073.) "The district attorney's discretionary functions extend from the investigation and gathering of evidence relating to criminal offenses [citation], through the crucial decisions of whom to charge and what charges to bring, to the numerous choices the prosecutor makes at trial." ( People v. Eubanks (1996) 14 Cal.4th 580, 589, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 200, 927 P.2d 310.) "The prosecution's authority in this regard is founded, among other things, on the principle of separation of powers, and generally is not subject to supervision by the judicial branch." (
[251 Cal.Rptr.3d 418]
Birks , at p. 134, 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 848, 960 P.2d 1073.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.