The following excerpt is from United States v. Rosario, 18-2739 (2nd Cir. 2019):
We generally have declined to articulate precise standards for assessing the district court's imposition of a particular sentence, see United States v. Pereira, 465 F.3d 515, 524 (2d Cir. 2006), and are hesitant to require any specific incantations or utterances by the district court, see United States v. Rattoballi, 452 F.3d 127, 138 (2d Cir. 2006), abrogated in part on other grounds by Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). Nevertheless, district courts "must adequately explain the chosen sentence to allow for meaningful appellate review." Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 50 (2007).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.