What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the opening brief of a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hatter, H046133 (Cal. App. 2019):
1. Defendant initially filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, but subsequently moved to withdraw the brief. Accordingly, this court struck defendant's initial opening brief.
2. All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant statutory references to the Penal Code in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
