The following excerpt is from Hornish v. King Cnty., 899 F.3d 680 (9th Cir. 2018):
5 Because the identity of such permitted incidental uses has not been disputed in this case, we do not opine as to what such uses might be. See Jimenez v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 765 F.3d 1161, 1164 n.4 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding that where an issue is mentioned without legal argument, the issue is neither specifically nor distinctly argued and thus not subject to review).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.