What are the obligations of defendant in a contract of employment where the employer is required to dispose of his business prior to the expiration of the contract?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from O. Miller Associates v. Gca Corp., 138 Cal.Rptr. 437, 69 Cal.App.3d 966 (Cal. App. 1977):

With this understanding we can now examine the effect of the sale of the business on these obligations of defendant. 9 No one questions, of course, defendant's 'right to sell its business,' but the issue is whether defendant could do so without incurring any liability for breach of its contract with plaintiff. (Silva v. McCoy, 259 Cal.App.2d

Page 441

The governing principles are well stated in the leading case of Langenberg v. Guy, 77 Cal.App. 664, 668, 247 P. 621, 622: '. . . For of course it must be conceded that where a party to a contract of employment obligates himself by either an express or an implied agreement not to disable himself from continuing the employment for a stipulated time, he will make himself liable in damages for breach of contract if, by a sale of his business before the expiration of the stipulated period, he voluntarily puts it out of his power to continue the employment to the end of its term in the manner agreed to by him. It may also be conceded that, in the absence of some provision in a contract of employment which tends to negative the implication that the employment will continue uninterruptedly during a specified term, one who has bound himself to employ another during a definite time for a compensation, the amount whereof can be earned and determined only by an actual performance of the services over the whole of the stipulated period, will render himself liable for damages for breach of contract if he makes a disposition of his affairs which renders it impossible for him to receive the services in the manner contemplated by the contract. In every such case the question in the last analysis is simply this: Do the terms of the contract--and, if the [69 Cal.App.3d 973] contract is ambiguous, do the circumstances under which it was made--necessitate the implication that the employer had undertaken not to dispose of his business during a fixed period of time?' (Citations omitted.)

Other Questions


What is the difference between a written employment contract and an oral employment contract? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3854 require a defendant to prove that his negligence was a proximate cause of the employer's workers' compensation benefits? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant required to have two prior convictions under section 667, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code under the three strikes law? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What evidence would have been required to convict a defendant of a prior murder? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence, what are the factors that determine whether the prior conviction should be admitted to the jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim that a regulation does not give notice to an employer when the employer is an "employer"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test required by the California Supreme Court to convict a defendant of a prior felony conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the rule that prior determination is not conclusive either if injustice would result or if the public interest requires that the prior determination not to be foreclosed? (California, United States of America)
What evidence would have been required to convict a defendant of a prior murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.