What are the non-applicable Mitigating Factors in determining whether a defendant lacked remorse?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Odle, 247 Cal.Rptr. 137, 45 Cal.3d 386, 754 P.2d 184 (Cal. 1988):
As we have recently held in People v. Ruiz (1988) 44 Cal.3d 589, 622, 244 Cal.Rptr. 200, 749 P.2d 854, the prosecutor's argument that defendant lacked remorse was not error.
3. Nonapplicable Mitigating Factors
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's lack of remorse a factor in determining whether he committed a homicide? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's lack of remorse a factor in determining whether he committed a homicide? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the absence of a mitigating factor constitutes an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury double-count the factors used to determine whether a defendant has been convicted of a capital crime as a result of the factor? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's financial condition is to be considered a factor in determining punitive damages? (California, United States of America)
