What are the legal implications of a voluntary pretrial dismissal of an action?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Khavarian Enterprises, Inc. v. Commline, Inc., B243467 (Cal. App. 2013):

"Moreover, upon fresh consideration of the matter, we are of the view that the practical difficulties associated with contractual attorney fee cost determinations in voluntary pretrial dismissal cases are not as great as suggested by the majority in Olen, supra, 21 Cal.3d 218. The Olen majority soundly reasoned that attorney fees should not be awarded automatically to parties in whose favor a voluntary dismissal has been entered. In particular, it seems inaccurate to characterize the defendant as the 'prevailing party' if the plaintiff dismissed the action only after obtaining, by means of settlement or otherwise, all or most of the requested relief, or if the plaintiff dismissed for reasons, such as the defendant's insolvency, that have nothing to do with the probability of success on the merits. The Olen majority also soundly reasoned that scarce judicial resources should not be used to try the merits of voluntarily dismissed actions merely to determine which party would or should have prevailed had the action not been dismissed. But we do not agree that the only remaining alternative is an inflexible rule denying contractual attorney fees as costs in all voluntary pretrial dismissal cases. Rather, a court may determine whether there is a prevailing party, and if so which party meets that definition, by examining the terms of the contract at issue, including any contractual definition of the term 'prevailing party' and any contractual provision governing payment of attorney fees in the event of dismissal. If, as here, the contract allows the prevailing party to recover attorney fees but does not define 'prevailing party' or expressly either authorize or bar recovery of attorney fees in the event an action is dismissed, a court may base its attorney fees decision on a pragmatic definition of the extent to which each party has realized its litigation objectives, whether by judgment, settlement, or otherwise. (See Hsu v. Abbara, supra, 9 Cal.4th 863, 877.)

Other Questions


Does a voluntary dismissal of an action result in a judgment in the absence of a defendant as to whom the action was dismissed? (California, United States of America)
Does a voluntary dismissal of an action result in a judgment in the absence of a defendant as to whom the action was dismissed? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
When an underlying action is voluntarily dismissed, can the underlying action be dismissed? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for voluntary dismissal of an action by a party who has followed the action through to completion? (California, United States of America)
In a declaratory relief action, in what circumstances will the court order a judgment of dismissal rather than a declaration of dismissal? (California, United States of America)
Does a prior judgment dismissing a declaratory relief action to establish parental relationship with child conceived by artificial insemination with anonymous donor preclude a subsequent breach of contract action? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the provisions in the Criminal Code requiring the Attorney General to approve a motion to dismiss, strike or dismiss a prior conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to dismiss a motion to dismiss an action brought by an individual against an individual who is also a partnership and corporate defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for dismissal of an action brought by the owner of a property in which he alleges that the original summons was fatally defective? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.