What are the legal considerations that apply to the reformation of a statute to preserve its constitutionality?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from In re Reeves, 110 P.3d 1218, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 4, 35 Cal.4th 765 (Cal. 2005):

26. "A different set of considerations and limitations governs the reformation of statutes to preserve their constitutionality. [Citation.]" (People v. Garcia (1999) 21 Cal.4th 1, 15, fn. 9, 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 114, 980 P.2d 829.)

Other Questions


Does a federal decision construing a state forfeiture statute apply the same weight and authority as it applies to a federal forfeiture statute? (California, United States of America)
Does a promise to forbear from exercising a legal right constitute legal consideration in a settlement? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure apply where a course of conduct violated more than one statute but nevertheless constituted an indivisible transaction? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations apply to a cause of action based on federal law or constitutional principles? (California, United States of America)
Can a small possibility of a statute arguably being applied to protected conduct be invalidated or speculative restriction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the need for a full factual record apply in reviewing legal issues concerning the admissibility of a confession obtained in violation of the Constitution? (California, United States of America)
Does the prohibition against multiple punishment apply where there was a course of conduct that violated more than one statute but nevertheless constituted an indivisible transaction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances can localities proceed to enforce a statute of doubtful constitutionality by disobeying the statute? (California, United States of America)
Does the prohibition against multiple punishment apply where there was a course of conduct that violated more than one statute but nevertheless constituted an indivisible transaction? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.