What are the issues that have been raised in a motion for error review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Roberts, D067651 (Cal. App. 2015):
As we have indicated, counsel has asked this court to review the record for error as required by Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible, but not arguable issues to assist this court in its review of the record:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What are the requirements for a writ of prohibition to review a motion for review of a denial of the 995 motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a party who fails to raise issues before the trial court raise new issues on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to grant a motion for judicial review of a motion requiring a judicial review? (California, United States of America)
In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative? (California, United States of America)
When a motion for a new trial is granted on all or part of the issues raised in the motion, what grounds must the court specify? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to quash a finding that a determination of the merits of the complaint is not within the scope of the issues raised on the motion? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion, how do we review an order granting or denying a motion to strike under section 425.16 de novo? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
