What are the instructions given to the jury in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Threestar, 167 Cal.App.3d 747, 213 Cal.Rptr. 510 (Cal. App. 1985):

The trial court instructed the jury that: "An act committed or an omission made under an ignorance or mistake of fact which disproves any criminal intent is not a crime. [p] Thus a person is not guilty of a crime if he commits an act or omits to act under an honest and reasonable belief in the existence of certain facts and circumstances which, if true, would make such act or omission lawful." (CALJIC No. 4.35) The court also gave the following instructions, which comprised the court's modification of one of appellant's requested special instructions based on People v. Navarro (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d Supp. 1, 160 Cal.Rptr.

Page 515

Other Questions


What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is a defendant more culpable in committing two acts of sodomy than if they committed only one act of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is it possible for a defendant to sexually assault two women by touching their genitals? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the limitation instruction given to a jury in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.