What are the implications of the double jeopardy clause in the federal and state constitutions?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Malone, A140747 (Cal. App. 2015):

The double jeopardy clauses of the federal and state constitutions protect criminal defendants from repeated prosecutions for the same offense. (People v. Batts (2003) 30

Page 19

Other Questions


Does the state double jeopardy clause apply to federal double jeopardy? (California, United States of America)
Does the SVP Act's provision for an indeterminate term violate the due process clause, ex post facto clause and double jeopardy clause? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the federal and state constitutions governing the trial of a criminal defendant who is mentally incompetent? (California, United States of America)
Does the equal protection clause in the federal and state constitutions preclude intentional and purposeful discrimination in the enforcement of penal laws? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the state and federal double jeopardy provisions? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the double jeopardy clause in juvenile law? (California, United States of America)
Is a new federal constitutional rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions, like that of the Payne case, to apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the double jeopardy provisions in double jeopardy cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal and state prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct in a federal or federal criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the state and federal double jeopardy provisions? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.