What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hernandez-Delgado, H043755 (Cal. App. 2018):
"We review claims regarding a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion. [Citations.] Specifically, we will not disturb the trial court's ruling 'except on a showing the trial court exercised its discretion in an arbitrary, capricious, or patently absurd manner that resulted in a manifest miscarriage of justice.' [Citation.]" (People v. Goldsmith (2014) 59 Cal.4th 258, 266 (Goldsmith).)
2. Proceedings Below
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a court's rulings on the admission and exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a court's ruling on the admissibility of relevant evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
In a claim of error in the admission of evidence, can the trial court abuse its discretion to allow evidence to be admitted on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to any ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
