What are the findings of a court review for clear error in a challenge to the adequacy of pre-interrogation warnings?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Becky, 53 F.3d 340 (9th Cir. 1995):
7 This court reviews for clear error the factual findings underlying a challenge to the adequacy of pre-interrogation warnings. Connell, 869 F.2d at 1351.
8 See supra note 6.
9 See Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552, 559 (1980).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed findings of fact on a motion to suppress evidence for clear error? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing the application of a sophisticated means enhancement, what is the difference between a de novo review and a clear error review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a court's award of fees for abuse of discretion, how do we review the underlying factual determinations for clear error? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact being reviewed for clear error? (federal, United States of America)
What is the test for "clear error" in the evidentiary review of a finding by a federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the "plain error" standard of review in the context of a motion to overturn a finding of error at the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
