California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ceja, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 375, 4 Cal.4th 1134, 847 P.2d 55 (Cal. 1993):
In a letter brief filed shortly before oral argument, defendant argues that this instruction misstates or omits three elements of lying in wait: " a 'substantial period of lying in wait'; that the attack proceed from a position of advantage; and that the attack follow immediately after the watchful waiting." Although the instruction does not verbatim track our language in People v. Morales, supra, 48
Page 379
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.