What are the elements of alternative two wherein: (1) the existing policy or practice created an unreasonable risk of the Eighth Amendment injury?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Ruelas v. Harper, E051961 (Cal. App. 2015):

There is absolutely no reference in the special verdict as to the elements of alternative two wherein: "(1) the existing policy or practice created an unreasonable risk of the Eighth Amendment injury; (2) the supervisor was aware that the unreasonable risk was created; (3) the supervisor was indifferent to that risk; and (4) the injury resulted from the policy or practice." (Beers-Capitol v. Whetzel, supra, 256 F.3d at p. 134.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a supervisor was aware of an unreasonable risk created by a policy or practice? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action, can plaintiffs amend or amend the elements of their cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Does a consumer insurance policy need to be amended or amended so that the exclusionary language in the policy does not have to be changed? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to amend or amend the causes of action in response to a claim for bodily injury or property damage? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury need to be told that the element of offense is not a given, not a required element, and that the omission of that element is a harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to amend his second amended complaint to a third amended complaint? (California, United States of America)
Is the exclusion for injury or damage "arising out of the maintenance of a motor vehicle that is owned or operated by an insured...." in a personal injury policy? (California, United States of America)
Is a policy of exclusionary provisions in a personal injury policy valid on equal protection grounds? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of an amendment to Proposition 36 of the California Constitution requiring the Attorney General to produce a copy of the law where the law is amended or amended? (California, United States of America)
Does a Fourth Amendment balancing of the legitimate governmental interests in arrest against the reasonable expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment reveal the unreasonableness of a defendant's arrest and search? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.