What are the elements of a disparate treatment case?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Fresquez v. Cnty. of Stanislaus, 1:13-cv 1897-AWI-SAB (E.D. Cal. 2014):
The elements of a prima facie disparate treatment case are as follows: (1) Plaintiff belongs to a protected class; (2) she was qualified for her position; (3) she was subject to an adverse employment action; and (4) similarly situated individuals outside her protected class were treated more favorably. See Davis v. Team Elec. Co., 520 F.3d 1080, 1089 (9th Cir. 2008).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant who committed both enhancing elements of the elements of second-degree robbery and possession of a firearm an enhanced element of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the initial burden of establishing a case of disparate treatment under Title VII? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for "disparate treatment" in Title VII discrimination cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the case law on sentencing disparities between codefendants in criminal cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the reasons for a substantial disparity in treatment of those who did not stand trial in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the case law on "conservative treatment" in medical malpractice cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law in the context of the substantive elements of a sexual assault case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a prima facie case of disparate treatment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for punitive treatment of a defendant in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that supports a finding that a statement by a Canadian migration integrity officer in Port-au-Prince (the MIO) in Haiti does not constitute torture? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
