The following excerpt is from Vargas v. Guinn (In re Guinn), Adversary Proceeding No. 13-90232-CL, Bankruptcy Case No. 13-07239-CL7 (Bankr. S.D. Cal. 2014):
falsity of the representation; 3) intent to induce reliance; 4) justifiable reliance; and 5) damages." Id. at 524; see also Ghomeshi v. Sabban (In re Sabban), 600 F.3d 1219, 1222 (9th Cir. 2010).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.