California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ratliff v. Shiomoto, A144336 (Cal. App. 2017):
Ratliff contends the judgment must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence he was actually arrested, the police waited too long to advise him of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda), and the equipment used to test his blood was defective, making his blood results unreliable. We affirm the judgment.