What are the consequences if an employee becomes incompetent at the time of retirement and then dies?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Reinfeld v. San Francisco City and County Emp. Retirement System, 158 Cal.App.2d 460, 322 P.2d 508 (Cal. App. 1958):

The employee having long before become a member of the retirement system, he remained such a member until the happening of an event which would end that membership. Section 226 of Part I, Article 3 of the San Francisco Municipal Code provides for cessation of membership on death, retirement, insufficient employment time, discharge or resignation. Section 154 of the Charter, along with other matters with which we are not here concerned, provides that no permanent employee shall be discharged except for cause and then only after a hearing. One of the causes for removal or discharge therein listed is: Incompetence. Upon separation of an employee for any cause other than retirement, the employee or his estate would be entitled to return of all he had put into the fund. Upon retirement, the employee could no longer exercise any of the options (Charter section 165.2(B)), nor could he thereafter elect to recover his contributions. If he were legally incapacitated before retirement, his guardian could, of course, do for him whatever he otherwise could have done for himself. It is also provided in the Charter that if no election of option were made by the employee before the retirement, then his pension check would be for the maximum amount. The fact that decedent signed a couple of forms in which he elected [158 Cal.App.2d 463] to take the maximum amount during the time when according to the stipulation he was mentally incompetent is of no consequence, for what he did receive is just what he would have gotten if he had not signed either the 'compulsory service retirement form' or the 'election with regard to option.' The pension provisions of the City Charter are an integral portion of the contract of employment (Dryden v. Board of Pension Com'rs, 6 Cal.2d 575 at page 579, 59 P.2d 104). Here the provisions for miximum benefits if no election were made by the employee were in the Charter long before the employee became incompetent.

Other Questions


When a judgment is insufficient to provide residual proceeds to an employee's attorney, does the employee have to pay fees to the employee's lawyer? (California, United States of America)
When an employer and employee are separately represented by an attorney representing the employee, what is the value of the employee's attorney's services? (California, United States of America)
Does an employee's employee handbook say all employees must sign an arbitration agreement? (California, United States of America)
Does section 31725 of the California Retirement Board's Retirement Guidelines apply to an employee who has been terminated from his employment because of physical incapacity? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an employee is an employee or an independent contractor? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a defendant's failure to raise the issue of the penal consequences of an admission of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test to determine whether an employee is exempt from the California Employee Benefits Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the wife of a public employee have a vested interest in a pension until it becomes payable to her? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is adjudged incompetent under the California Criminal Code, what is the effect of the incompetentness statute on a preliminary hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3501 of the Social Security Act discriminate against a female employee who dies as a result of an industrial injury? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.