What are some cases that have been decided by the Court of Appeal in Ontario where the appellant was not conducting a criminal investigation?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Behle v. Tanner, B279050 (Cal. App. 2018):
White v. Towers and Bradbury v. Superior Court (Spencer), have no applicability to the case at bench. By her own admission, appellant was not conducting a criminal investigation and did not intend to instigate such an investigation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the findings and conclusions of the Court of Appeal in the Appeal Court of Ontario regarding the conduct of appellant's appointed attorney? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellate court amend an order of the Superior Court of Appeal in cases not before the court? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does section 987.8(b) of the California Criminal Code require a motion by the Court of Appeal to remand a case back to the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to continue to hear an appeal from an appellant who, as a result of the July 19, 2016 order rendered this appeal moot? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the court has allowed appellate counsel to represent an indigent criminal defendant in his first appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
