California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hinkston, B265925 (Cal. App. 2017):
None of appellant's arguments compel a contrary conclusion. This includes appellant's argument concerning his June 18, 2015 statement to the trial court that, "[t]he only thing I wasn't in compliance with actually was my - - was paying the money and absconding and that's because my social security was cut off." First, appellant did not make this statement under oath or pursuant to a lawful equivalent. The trial court was not obligated to believe appellant's unsworn statement. (See People v. White (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1340 [" '[u]nsworn
Page 10
testimony does not constitute "evidence" within the meaning of the Evidence Code.' "]; Evid. Code, 140, 710.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.