What administrative remedies must be exhausted before a court action is brought?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Manley v. Rowley, No. 15-15320 (9th Cir. 2017):
their administrative remedies prior to bringing a court action to redress prison conditions or occurrences. Id. at 1997(e)(a). This exhaustion requirement is mandatory, and "[a]ll available remedies must [] be exhausted; those remedies need not meet federal standards, nor must they be plain, speedy, and effective." Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524 (2002) (quotation marks omitted).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a statute or agency rule demands exhaustion of administrative remedies, does the federal court have jurisdiction to order the exhaustion of remedies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action in an administrative proceeding against Arnold for failing to exhaust his administrative remedies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss an action brought by a prisoner alleging that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an ERISA plaintiff have to exhaust administrative remedies before commencing an action in federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to dismiss an action brought by a prisoner who has not exhausted his administrative remedies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the court err in waiving the requirement that plaintiffs exhaust their administrative remedies before pursuing their claim in federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the findings of the US Supreme Court in dismissing an action brought by plaintiff Clay, who alleges that the district court erred by dismissing her other claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a diversity action brought by the California Board of Directors, how have the courts interpreted the findings of the federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a motion is brought before the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of a motion before the Court of Appeal, and the motion has been adjourned for a second time, is there an instance where this court should take jurisdiction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
