Does the City of Vancouver have a superior financial position in the litigation process?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Meade v Armstrong (City), 2018 BCSC 528 (CanLII):
Further, in this case, the City did not use its superior financial position to distort the litigation process to create an unfair advantage or to cause unnecessary costs to be incurred: Wepryk v. Juraschka, 2013 BCSC 804 at para. 15.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for putting a plaintiff in a better position than her original position? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any change in legal position or detriment caused by a change in the legal position of a defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a litigant be imputed income if they fail or refuse to disclose their financial circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate length of notice for a 30 year employee who has been dismissed from his position as a senior management position? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the court use its power to control the abuse of the court’s process by litigants pursuing vexatious applications? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is a party's financial position determined in a general election? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be put in a position where they would have been in a similar position if they had not been injured in an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between the original position and the injured position? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for placing a plaintiff in a position where she would have been in a similar position as a result of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
