What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that their negligence was the cause of their symptoms?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Stare v Whitehouse, 2019 BCSC 1445 (CanLII):

The plaintiff bears the onus of proving that the defendant’s negligence was the cause of his current symptoms: Warkentin v. Riggs, 2010 BCSC 1706.

Other Questions


What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that their injuries were caused by negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that negligence was not the sole cause of injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that negligence was the sole cause of injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the consequences of a plaintiff failing to prove their cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that their mental health condition was not a result of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining that a plaintiff’s negligence was the cause of her current symptoms? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to have to prove that their injuries to their knees result in loss of income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that they are liable for the loss of a person by negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove a contingency of her pre-existing condition to cause a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.