What is the standard of care of a lawyer in Vancouver from 2000 to 2003?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Olenga v. Sisett & Company, 2010 BCSC 271 (CanLII):
The standard of care to which a lawyer is held is that of a reasonably competent and diligent counsel in Vancouver from 2000 to 2003: Startup v. Blake, 2001 BCSC 8, 110 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1194.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of duty of a lawyer who is not a lawyer in the field of documentation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what cases have the courts restrained a lawyer from acting where the lawyer has previously acted jointly for another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the significance of the relative standard of living of the parties post post post-war compared to the standard living standard in their respective countries? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a lawyer be reprimanded for calling a colleague a "clueless" or a "foolish" lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current standard of review and the guidelines for applying that standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by the City of Vancouver not to grant a permit to Rastad to demolish a parking lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the law society of BC dealt with professional misconduct claims against a lawyer who incurred debts to another lawyer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current standard for determining if a motorist has acted accordance with the requisite standard? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care required for a professional to be considered in determining whether a professional met the requisite standard for care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of conduct for a lawyer who has lied to the Law Society of BC? (British Columbia, Canada)
